ARTICLE CRITIQUE BIOL 1322 The newspaper/magazine article I am critiquing comes from: Women’s Health , dated November/December 2005 . (Name of Publication) NOTE: Attach a copy of the article to this report. Answer the following questions: 1. What sort of language does the writer use? Do the words imply sensationalism or conclusive findings? Phrases such as “startling revelation” or “now we know” or “the study proved” are clues to whether the report is a sensational one.
Does the author take a tentative approach, using words such as may, might, or could? What do these words imply? I evaluate the language used in the publication as follows: The writer’s language in this article is factual. There is not sensationalism used; only factual information regarding the importance of vitamins and minerals is discussed. The author provides a persuasive recommendation of vitamin brands to buy and provides tips on how to prevent side effects such as upset stomach and burping when taking vitamin supplements 2. Is the finding placed in the context of previous nutrition findings?
We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!
Does the article imply that the current finding wipes out all that has gone before it? Can you detect a broad understanding of nutrition on the writer’s part? From what clues? For example, an article about folate and heart disease should say that saturated fat probably plays the major nutrition role in heart disease development. I believe the author’s understanding of previously reported findings to be: I believe the author understands the previously reported findings to be accurate. The author quotes several physicians throughout the article that ubstantiate the information provided. This article does not imply that the current information wipes out all that has gone before it. I can tell that the author has a good understanding of nutrition based on the supportive statements from physicians and recommendations provided. 3. Does the article mention whether the research results under discussion are published in a medical or nutrition journal? Where? Does the journal mentioned publish valid scientific findings? I judge the credibility of the item to be: I judge the credibility of this article to be accurate.
Although there was no mention of whether or not the information provided is published in a medical or nutritional journal, the author states that the dosages given are the Recommended Daily Allowances. RDA’s easily be verified online through numerous websites and journal articles. 4. How were the results obtained? Can you tell from the article whether this was a case study, an epidemiological study, and intervention study, or a laboratory study? How does that information affect your understanding of what the results have contributed to nutrition science?
The methods used to obtain these results were: From this text of the article I conclude that the information provided came as the result of case studies. Knowing that the data has been tested and proven shows me that nutritional science is an evolving field of study. Just like any other science, what works for one person mat not necessarily work for another. These studies produce Recommended Daily Allowances that provide us with a guide to start our individual nutritional plan and then adjustments can be made as necessary for optimal individual health. 5. Does the finding apply to you?
Should you change your eating patterns because of it? In what ways did the subjects resemble or differ from you? Were there enough subjects to make the study seem valid? The results of the study apply to the following populations: The results of this article apply to the general population. Everyone should be on some type of vitamin regime. Whether the RDA is achieved through natural foods or supplements, it is important that the allowances are met to have a healthier life. From this article, I have learned more about the importance of a vitamin regime and will begin taking the recommended set of vitamins daily. . Does the finding make sense to you in light of what you know about nutrition? To a reader without extensive nutritional background, the results of a study may be misleading. This report might mislead by: The only way that I can see this article to be misleading, is when specific brands are labeled as “best buys” for vitamin supplements. Although the author suggests a brand, it should be stated that as long as the specific values are achieved that it does not matter what brand is on the label.
Related essay samples:
- Vitamin C and Scurvy
- “The Secret Language” by Daisy Zamora Essay
- Writing Analysticallly
- How Does the Writer of This Text Use Language and Grammar
- Scholarly Writing Essay
- Fruit Juice Essay
- Advertising Language
- Nestle Case Answer
- Article Review Old Earth Theory
- Overview of Risk Management and Quality Management in Healthcare
- The the better. The author claims that
- Bharati Mukherjee, American Dreamer Essay
- The Future of English as the Global Language Is Assured
- October 24 Zeen Li CRM1300 Dr
- Analisys on Flower Fed Buffaloes