New York Row Houses Architecture And Design History Essay

Row houses were and still highly popular in New York every bit good as in the American and English architecture. The outgrowth of rowhouses resulted from the turning demand in new houses, where people could settle and populate in a comfy ambiance. At the same clip, the development of rowhouses was the consequence of the urbanisation of England and America. The big figure of people moved to metropoliss, where they have to settle and construct their ain houses ( Stewart, 158 ) . However, the building of new houses proved to be rather expensive and new houses build for individual households merely took excessively much infinite in the urban country that lead to the creative activity of the new signifier and manner in English and subsequently American architecture which led to the creative activity of rowhouses built specifically for the turning urban population of big metropoliss, like London or New York. Rowhouses were destined for a big figure of people and they saved the infinite in the urban country because they did non hold paces typical for private houses people used to and they were built near to each other that allowed them to salvage infinite and settle a big of people at that place. In the class of clip, rowhouses proved their efficiency in the urban country and by the mid- and late-19th century they became the mainstream type of houses built in such metropolis as New York that allowed the metropolis to turn fast and salvage the infinite at the same time.

Types, manners and features of rowhouses

Initially, rowhouses were built to supply the perchance larger figure of people with flats, where people could populate. At the same clip, the chief feature of rowhouses, which differed them from traditional houses built in England every bit good as the US, was the comparatively little infinite the rowhouses occupied. Rowhouses were built near to each other to salvage infinite. In add-on, another of import feature of rowhouses is the figure of floors they had. Unlike conventional houses, rowhouses had three or four floors and people could busy them and populate in their ain flat. In such a manner, several households could populate in one house that saved a batch of infinite and allowed occupants of rowhouses to populate following to each other but still have their ain flat. In other words, people lived in the little infinite occupied by the rowhouses but they had an chance to hold their ain flat separated from others.

This text is NOT unique.

Don't plagiarize, get content from our essay writers!
Order now

On the other manus, the flats people had in rowhouses were systematically smaller compared to conventional houses people used to construct before the visual aspect of rowhouses. Conventional houses were more broad, they had paces and were inhabited by one household merely ( Fuqua, 192 ) . In contrast, rowhouses were larger but they did non hold paces every bit big as conventional houses and, what is more, several households inhabited rowhouses that allowed to settle a larger figure of people in smaller infinite.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

In the class of clip, rowhouses changed and evolved severally to demands of people and to alterations in the architecture. In this respect, it is possible to separate several types and manners of rowhouses in New York, including traditional brownstone rowhouses, Italianate brownstone rowhouses and Anglo-Italianate rowhouses ( Bradford, 174 ) . In fact, each type of rowhouses had its specificities, which was peculiarly distinguishable on the floor programs of edifices. Basically, the rowhouses in New York had different floor programs. Traditionally, rowhouses were supposed to hold an flat per floor, where one household could populate. However, some of them were destined to the life of two households on the floor. However, such rowhouses appeared in the late nineteenth century in New York in response to the turning demand for the existent estate and turning population of the metropolis. This was the clip, when the in-migration from Europe increased and led to the visual aspect of new rowhouses, known as Italianate brownstone rowhouses, which had more flats and could settle more households. Finally, the ulterior rowhouses became more broad, while some houses het the 4th floor alternatively of traditional tree floors and, therefore, allowed a larger figure of people to populate in these rowhouses.

Brownstone rowhouses in New York in 1845-1860

On analysing different types of rowhouses, it is possible to separate brownstone rowhouses, which were peculiarly popular in New York in 1845 aa‚¬ ” 1860s. In fact, brownstone rowhouses were traditional rowhouses, which were built in conformity with traditionally be aftering and they were similar to brownstone houses of England. The outside of brownstone rowhouses and their frontages was created in brownstone, whereas the inside included the stairway and flats on each floor. The brownstone rowhouses were simple in their design and architecture and they had basic comfortss. On the other manus, these rowhouses were simplistic, in a manner. Materials used for the building of these houses were reddish-brown rocks, which made the edifices comparatively inexpensive in footings of building and provided comparatively comfy conditions of life since they preserved the heat in winter and kept the interior cool in summer.

Italianate brownstone rowhouses in New York

At the same clip, conventional brownstone rowhouses were steadily replaced by Italianate brownstone rowhouses, which were larger and could incorporate more than one flat on the floor. In this respect, the chief feature of the Italianate brownstone rowhouses was their monumentality, particularly compared to traditional brownstone rowhouses built in the traditional English manner. These houses had different design, particularly in respect to their outside. For case, some Italianate rowhouses retained the traditional brick faAA§ade but they besides got the rusticated cellar degree, room access enframements, and window inside informations, which were executed in brownstone ( Herman, 201 ) . In such a manner, Italianate rowhouses became a kind of epicurean rowhouses, which were rather different from conventional rowhouses. In fact, Italianate brownstone rowhouses were non rowhouses destined to people, who need some shelter to populate in but they were stylish and, in a manner, epicurean edifices.

Anglo-Italianate rowhouses in New York

However, the luxury of the Italianate brownstone rowhouses were steadily replaced by the new type of rowhouses, which were built in a different manner aa‚¬ ” Anglo-Italianate rowhouses. Anglo-Italianate rowhouses preserved some epicurean elements of Italianate brownstone rowhouses but they focused on the practical facet of edifice. What is meant here is the fact that the building of Anglo-Italianate rowhouses took into consideration the monetary value of new rowhouses and costs of their building. Companies constructing Anglo-Italianate rowhouses attempted to salvage costs and, at the same time, they attempted to do rowhouses more comfy and convenient for life. Therefore, they preserved cosmetic elements which did non interfere into the interior infinite of edifices and which still brought certain luxury to Anglo-Italianate rowhouses. On the other manus, interior decorators and designers attempted to utilize the full potency of the interior infinite of edifices to do suites and flats more broad. As a consequence, the outside of Anglo-Italianate rowhouses became less epicurean but, alternatively, the inside of edifices became more broad and larger compared to Italianate brownstone rowhouses.


Therefore, taking into history all above mentioned, it is of import to put accent on the fact that rowhouses were highly popular in New York in the nineteenth century. Furthermore, the outgrowth of rowhouses was determined by the rapid growing of the metropolis and the consistent addition of the urban population forced designers and interior decorators to develop new types of edifices, where a big figure people could populate together but households could hold their ain flats in the rowhouses. This is why brownstone rowhouses became so popular by the mid-19th century in New York. However, in the class of clip, particularly in the 1850s – 1860s, brownstone rowhouses evolved systematically giving rise to Italianate brownstone rowhouses celebrated for their epicurean design and architecture. Nevertheless, in the late nineteenth century designers and interior decorators turned once more to the practical facet of edifice of rowhouses giving birth to Anglo-Italianate rowhouses, which were less epicurean but more broad interior and more convenient for life.

Related essay samples:

  1. Living in the block of flats Essay
  2. Conventional in situ construction
  3. Korean Traditional House: Grass Roofed House Essay
  4. Taipei Modern Building Icon Engineering Essay
  5. Philip Johnson’s Glass House Essay
  6. The History Of The Victorian Architecture History Essay
  7. The Anglo-Saxon Period and Beowulf
  8. Comparing and Contrasting Two Suburbs Essay
  9. Life in the Colonial Cities Essay
  10. The Basics of Supply and Demand Essay
  11. Sustainability In Green Building Case Study Environmental Sciences Essay
  12. Foodservice Industry Essay
  13. Living in a Flat or a House? Essay
  14. HH Richardson Essay Research Paper Henry Hobson
  15. Cross-cultural Communication Essay